👤Author
Name: Radu Bagdasar
Affiliation: Cercetător independent
📄Article
Citation Recommendation: BAGDASAR, Radu. „Critica între condiția de «magistratură», «cățea literară» și tămâierea béată”. RITL, New Series, XVIII, 2024, p. 227–239. doi: 10.59277/ritl.2024.18.20
Titlul: CRITICA ÎNTRE CONDIȚIA DE „MAGISTRATURĂ”, «CĂȚEA LITERARĂ» ȘI TĂMÂIEREA BÉATĂ
Pages: 227–239
Language: Romanian
URL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2024/20_R_Bagdasar.pdf
DOI: 10.59277/ritl.2024.18.20
Abstract: The text discusses the roles of internal and external critique in the development of a literary work. On one hand, the creator’s intelligence, which also includes a strong critical dimension, is not identical to that of the critic, whose perspective entails a distancing and objectification that the author, considering it’s their own work, finds more challenging to adopt. The only drawback of external critique is that it arrives post facto and can only enhance the writer’s future style — thus benefiting subsequent creations, but not the one it critiques. Authentic critique plays an indispensable role as a guardian of value when it is competent, anticipatory, and constructive without being indulgent. The conclusion is that a balanced critical spirit, grounded in a broad culture allowing for diverse references, is a prerequisite for quality.
Keywords: internal and external critique, Eugène Ionesco, Woolf, Murakami, Sabato
Bibliography
Goldoni, Carlo (MCMLXXXVII), Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire de sa vie et à celle de son théâtre, Paris: Mercure de France.
Ionesco, Eugène (1986), Non, Paris: Gallimard.
Ionesco, Eugène (1996), Entre la Vie et le Rêve. Entretiens avec Claude Bonnefoy, Paris: Gallimard.
Woolf, Virginia (1965), A Writer’s Diary, Edited by Leonard Woolf, London: The Hogarth Press.