The review for Literary History and Theory

ISTORIA LITERARĂ ŞI PROVOCĂRILE ACTUALITĂŢII. MODELE, TEORII, PRACTICI DISCURSIVE

December 15, 2013

👤Author

Name: Antonio Patraş
Affiliation: Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi

📄Article

Citation Recommendation: PATRAŞ, Antonio. „Istoria literară şi provocările actualităţii. modele, teorii, practici discursive”. In: RITL, New Series, VII, No. 1-4, January-December 2013, p. 51-58
Titlul: ISTORIA LITERARĂ ŞI PROVOCĂRILE ACTUALITĂŢII. MODELE, TEORII, PRACTICI DISCURSIVE
Title: LITERARY HISTORY AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES. MODELS, THEORIES, DISCOURSE PRACTICES
Pages: 51-58
Language: Română
URL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2013/6_A_Patras.pdf

Abstract: The present essay endeavours to illustrate a few of the most characteristic methods of inquiry into the literary phenomenon, by working on the current distinction between literary criticism (which is supposed to be synchronous) and literary history (implicitly, a diachronic approach). Another necessary discrimination appears to be the one between literary history – perceived as fundamental among all subjects of study, and the history of literature that is nothing less than an ordinary branch of literary history, the latter comprising a larger and more diversified range of approaches.

Keywords: literary criticism, literary history, the history of literature, aesthetic canon, aesthetic judgement, taste, intuition, common-sense

No Comments

Comments are closed.