The review for Literary History and Theory

„EU FUI FĂCĂTORIU DE PACE, CA MIELU CU LUPU”: EVALUAREA DIN PERSPECTIVA AUTORULUI ÎN „CRONICA BANATULUI” DE NICOLAE STOICA DE HAŢEG

December 15, 2013

👤Author

Name: Raluca Levonian

📄Article

Citation Recommendation: LEVONIAN, Raluca. „«Eu fui făcătoriu de pace, ca mielu cu lupu»: evaluarea din perspectiva autorului în «Cronica Banatului» de Nicolae Stoica de Haţeg”. In: RITL, New Series, VII, No. 1-4, January-December 2013, p. 221-231
Titlul: „EU FUI FĂCĂTORIU DE PACE, CA MIELU CU LUPU”: EVALUAREA DIN PERSPECTIVA AUTORULUI ÎN „CRONICA BANATULUI” DE NICOLAE STOICA DE HAŢEG
Title: “I WAS A PEACE-MAKER, LIKE THE LAMB WITH THE WOLF”: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE IN “THE BANAT CHRONICLE”, BY NICOLAE STOICA OF HAŢEG
Pages: 221-231
Language: Romanian
URL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2013/21_R_Levonian.pdf

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the realization of authorial evaluation within a particular type of text, a Romanian chronicle written in the first half of the 19th century by the priest Nicolae Stoica. The theoretical framework is based on the definition of evaluation and on the four key parameters of evaluation identified by Thompson and Hunston (2001). The results show that all the parameters are represented in the text and that the use of this scheme allows a structured investigation of the various occurences of evaluative fragments within the text analyzed. However, there are also instances of evaluation, as irony or humorous evaluation, for example, which can be explained only through a more refined analysis.

Keywords: evaluation, discourse, literature, chronicle, Nicolae Stoica

Bibliography:

Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, 1989: Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect, „Text” 9 (1), p. 93–124.

Du Bois, John W., 2007: The stance triangle, în Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 139–182.

Englebretson, Robert, 2007: Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction, în Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 1–25.

Hunston, Susan, 2001: Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in Persuasive Texts, în Hunston, Susan, Thompson, Geoff (eds.): Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 176–207.

Hunston, Susan, Thompson, Geoff (eds.), 2001: Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Lemny, Ştefan, 1990: Sensibilitate şi istorie în secolul XVIII românesc, Bucureşti, Editura Meridiane.

Martin, J.R., White, P.R.R., 2005: The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Hampshire, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Mioc, Damaschin, 1981: Introducere, în Stoica de Haţeg, Nicolae, 1981: Cronica Banatului. Studiu introductiv, ediţie, glosar şi indice de Damaschin Mioc, ediţia a doua revizuită, Timişoara, Editura Facla.

Neumann, Victor, 2006: Tentaţia lui homo europaeus: geneza ideilor moderne în Europa Centrală şi de Sud-Est, ediţia a treia, Iaşi, Editura Polirom.

Păcurariu, Mircea, 1996: Dicţionarul teologilor români, Bucureşti, Editura Univers Enciclopedic.

Scheibman, Joanne, 2007: Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations, în Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 111–138.

Stoica de Haţeg, Nicolae, 1981: Cronica Banatului. Studiu introductiv, ediţie, glosar şi indice de Damaschin Mioc, ediţia a doua revizuită, Timişoara, Editura Facla.

Thompson, Geoff, Hunston, Susan, 2001: Evaluation: An Introduction, în Hunston, Susan, Thompson, Geoff (eds.): Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 1–27.

No Comments

Comments are closed.