👤Author Name: Nicoleta SălcudeanuAffiliation: Institutul de Cercetări Socio-Umane „Gheorghe Şincai” al Academiei Române, Târgu MureșContact: elite573@yahoo.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: SĂLCUDEANU, Nicoleta. „Mihai Sin – suprafețele prozei”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 317-328.Titlul: MIHAI SIN – SUPRAFEȚELE PROZEITitle: MIHAI SIN – THE SURFACES OF PROSEPages: 317-328Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/17_N_Salcudeanu.pdf Abstract: The author clings from the very beginning to the substance of the harmlesss immediacy. Inside the benign, daytime writing, expressed through small, seemingly insignificant gesture, it is revealed, exasperatingly and unsettling slowly, the hideous figure of the absolute evil, it is revealed the bordering hell, the hell itself, on the line where the fragile human faces its intrinsically evil, but also its infernal otherness. Without any irony, but with the addition of substantial steel lucidity, the writing of Mihai Sin is a frowning aspect of French moralism, a mix of prose, essays and pamphlets, and vision is that of an angry Candide, a Candide obviously more skeptical than Voltaire himself. The great stake is actually the moral manifesto, ultimate and realistic at the same time. It’s about death, about all its forms, from the individual to that of an entire world. Keywords: Mihai Sin, prose, novel, essay,…

👤Author Name: Violeta BercaruAffiliation: Universitatea din BucureștiContact: violetabercaru@yahoo.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: BERCARU, Violeta. „Definiri ale metaforei – metaforismului – demetaforizării”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 295-316.Titlul: DEFINIRI ALE METAFOREI – METAFORISMULUI – DEMETAFORIZĂRIITitre: DÉFINITIONS DE LA MÉTAPHORE – LE MÉTAPHORISME – LA DÉMÉTAPHORISATIONPages: 295-316Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/16_V_Bercaru.pdf Résumé: Ľétude couvre une analyse du phénomène de croissance et de diminution du métaphorisme dans la modernité, l’apparition d’un champ métaphorique fermé représenté par la prévalence de l’existentiel par rapport à la forme artistique élaborée ou révélatrice, de même elle s’occupe de la précedence de ce champ métaphorique fermé par une phase intermédiaire, représentée par la dépoétisation de la métaphore et la configuration d’un trope implicitatif/ la métaphore incluse dans la séquence. On souligne, également, le rôle de la connotation et de ľimplicitation, la flexibilisation de la communication connotation/denotation, à travers un degré ďinclination ďun repère envers ľautre. Si Aristotel considérait que la qualité principale du discours est la clarté sans glisser dans le commun, en soulignant les metaphores, Jean Cohen dans la modernité synthétise une idée aristotélienne, configurant une poéticité qui consiste dans la perte de la signification, suivie ďune recuperation de celle-ci. Une brève histoire des visions…

👤Author Name: Ioana MirceaAffiliation: Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din SibiuContact: ioana.mircea@ulbsibiu.ro 📄Article Citation Recommendation: MIRCEA, Ioana. „Conceptul de istorie literară”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 287-293.Titlul: CONCEPTUL DE ISTORIE LITERARĂTitle: THE CONCEPT OF LITERARY HISTORYPages: 287-293Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/15_I_Mircea.pdf Abstract: This paper offers an overview on the concept of literary history: the presentation opens with the returning to two classic definitions of it and with the identification of its dual character, objective and subjective. In order to study the subject, revived after the 1990s, one must first clearly define literary theory, critique, and history; decide whether they are complementary or contradictory; and see how literary science interacts with the concept. We can identify a hierarchy in which theory comes first, critique second and history last, and then examine the adaptation of dichotomies and the way in which literary history is perceived by various Romanian authors. Keywords: definition, G. Călinescu, René Wellek, literary theory, literary critique, dichotomies. Bibliography: Aseguinolaza, Fernando Cabo, Gonzalez, Anxo Abuin, Dominguez, César, A Comparative History of Literatures in the Iberian Peninsula, vol. I, John Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam, 2007.  Băciuț, Nicolae, O istorie a literaturii române contemporane în interviuri, Suceava, Editura Reîntregirea, 2005. Călinescu,…

👤Author Name: Cătălin SturzaAffiliation: Cercetător asociat, Academia RomânăContact: catalinsturza@gmail.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: STURZA, Cătălin. „Două forme productive în anii 1990 şi 2000: eclectismul postmodern şi autoficţiunea”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 269-286Titlul: DOUĂ FORME PRODUCTIVE ÎN ANII 1990 ŞI 2000: ECLECTISMUL POSTMODERN ŞI AUTOFICŢIUNEATitle: TWO PRODUCTIVE FORMS IN THE 1990S AND 2000S: THE POSTMODERN ECLECTICISM AND THE AUTOFICTIONPages: 269-286Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/14_C_Sturza.pdf Abstract: This article discusses two productive forms of Romanian prose of the last two decades: on the one hand, the novel that refines and moves beyond (by means of parody) the Postmodern eclecticism; on the other hand, a form borrowed in the 1990s and 2000s from the French prose by the young Romanian novelists of 2000 – generically known as Autofiction. The article selects and analyzes three relevant novels for each of the two forms. Thus, the Postmodern eclecticism is illustrated by the Orbitor series, of Mircea Cărtărescu – which is perhaps the most debated and challenged series (by the literary criticism) of the last two decades –; Christina Domestica şi Vânătorii de suflete and Simion liftnicul. Roman cu îngeri şi moldoveni, of Peter Cimpoeşu. The Autofiction is illustrated by the debut novel of…

👤Author Author Name: Doina Matei MarcuAuthor Affiliation: Universitatea „Dunărea de Jos”din GalațiContact: doina_marcu_matei@yahoo.com 📄Article metadata Citation Recommendation: MATEI MARCU, Doina.  „Aspecte ale „înregimentării asumate” de scriitori în presa comunistă din perioada 1949–1965”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 233-267.Titlul: ASPECTE ALE „INREGIMENTARII ASUMATE” DE SCRIITORI IN PRESA COMUNISTA DIN PERIOADA 1949–1965Title: ASPECTS OF THE WRITERS’ “ASSUMED JOINING THE COMMUNIST PARTY” IN THE ROMANIAN JOURNALS OF THE 1949–1965 PERIODPages: 233-267Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/13_D_Marcu_Matei.pdf Abstract: Authors who had to live in a totalitarian environment published poetry, prose, drama, literary criticism or political articles in the press as power had them do. After the first years of Communism, to remain present in the cultural world of Romanian literature, they write obediently, following the guidelines of socialist realism. The directives of the one party hierarchy appear in the lines of characters, but also in the words used by criticism, in which textual analysis becomes absurd. Censorship is a safety net for the authorities. The tendencies of the “new literature” crystalize and they remain in place for many decades. Today this work is only of interest to those who are passionate about literary criticism and history. Keywords: authors, press, power, obedience, socialist…

👤Author Name: Adrian TudurachiAffiliation: Institutul de Lingvistică şi Istorie Literară „Sextil Pușcariu” al Academiei Române, Cluj-NapocaContact: adrian.tudurachi@gmail.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: TUDURACHI, Adrian. „Mihail Dragomirescu”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 225–231.Titlul: MIHAIL DRAGOMIRESCUTitle: MIHAIL DRAGOMIRESCUPages: 225-231Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/12_A_Tudurachi.pdf Bibliography: Lovinescu, Opere, IV, 247–263, V, 115–116, VI, 271–272, VIII, 201–203, IX, 195–197;  Aderca, Contribuţii, II, 44–56, 576–579, 655–656, 773–775;  Perpessicius, Opere, VI, 9–13, IX, 471–475, X, 128–129, XI, 411–413, 436–437; Constantinescu, Scrieri, II, 471–783;  Omagiu lui Mihai Dragomirescu, Bucureşti, 1928; Zarifopol, Eseuri, 105–107; Streinu, Pagini, IV, 168–184;  Munteano, Panorama, 87–90; Tudor Vianu, Mihail Dragomirescu, Bucureşti, 1939; Călinescu, Ist. lit. (1941), 571, Ist. lit. (1982), 643–644; Dima, Gândirea, passim; Tudor Vianu, Trei critici literari: Titu Maiorescu, Mihail Dragomirescu, E. Lovinescu, Bucureşti, 1944; Popovici, Studii, VI, 43–55;  Ovidiu Papadima, Estetica lui Mihail Dragomirescu, RITL, 1966, 2;  Z. Ornea, Trei esteticieni: M. Dragomirescu, H. Sanielevici, P. P. Negulescu, Bucureşti, 1968; Ciopraga, Lit. rom., 725–731; Micu, Început, 171–175, 494–497;  Titu Popescu, Mihail Dragomirescu, estetician, Bucureşti, 1973;  Dumitru Matei, Mihail Dragomirescu. Privire critică asupra sistemului filosofic şi estetic, Bucureşti, 1974; Alexandru Tudorică, Mihail Dragomirescu, teoretician al literaturii, Bucureşti, 1981; Leonida Maniu, Introducere în opera lui Mihail Dragomirescu, Bucureşti, 1983; Anghelescu, Lectura, 157–162;…

👤Author Name: Andrei TerianAffiliation: Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu, Facultatea de Litere şi ArteContact: andreiterian@gmail.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: TERIAN, Andrei. „Andrei Bodiu”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 219–223.Titlul: ANDREI BODIUTitle: ANDREI BODIUPages: 219-223Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/11_A_Terian.pdf Bibliography: Alexandru Mușina, Brașov, „Cercul literar 19”, TR, 1982, 28; Mircea Mihăieș, Turneul candidaților, O, 1988, 23; Florin Manolescu, Poezia Grupului de la Brașov, LCF, 1991, 23;  Ioan Moldovan, Cvartet, F, 1991, 10; Sanda Cordoș, Ritmul respirației, TR, 1991, 37; Al. Cistelecan, [Andrei Bodiu], VTRA, 1991, 12, LCF, 1994, 9, F, 2006, 9, F, 2007, 3; Traian T. Coșovei, [Andrei Bodiu], CNT, 1993, 28–29, 2002, 9; Caius Dobrescu, Lada și omul, VTRA, 1995, 1–2; Cornel Moraru, Un maratonist al clipei, VTRA, 1995, 1–2; Galaicu-Păun, Poezia, 196–198; Gheorghe Crăciun, Poezie de mare viteză pentru un alergător de cursă lungă, OC, 2000, 13;  Simona Popescu, Despre numele care se destramă în alte geometrii, OC, 2000, 18; Bucur, Poeți optzeciști, 30–34, 230–232; Grigurcu, Poezie, I, 132–134;  C. Rogozanu, [Andrei Bodiu], RL, 2001, 42, SDC, 2005, 33;  Ion Bogdan Lefter, Comentatorul de poezie, OC, 2002, 124; Irina Marin, Coșbuc, artist livresc, RL, 2003, 40; Șerban Axinte, Andrei Bodiu – şapte teme ale romanului postpașoptist,…

👤Author Name: Teodora DumitruAffiliation: Institutul de Istorie și Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” al Academiei Române;Contact: teo_dora_dumitru@yahoo.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: DUMITRU, Teodora. „Mircea Dinescu”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 211–218.Titlul: MIRCEA DINESCUTitle: MIRCEA DINESCUPages: 211-218Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/10_T_Dumitru.pdf Bibliography: Constantin, A doua carte, 265–268; Iorgulescu, Scriitori, 54–56; Raicu, Practica scrisului, 378–382; Regman, Explorări, 223–226;  Poantă, Radiografii, I, 288–290, II, 55–62;  Grigurcu, Poeţi, 508–515; Munteanu, Jurnal, II, 170–180, IV, 190–192; Dimitriu, Singurătatea, 160–165;  Raicu, Contemporani, 164–177;  Doinaş, Lectura, 250–253; Dobrescu, Foiletoane, II, 61–69;  Iorgulescu, Critică, 70–73; Crohmălniceanu, Pâinea noastră, 118–121; Iorgulescu, Ceara, 155–158; Simion, Scriitori, III, 399–414; Cristea, Modestie, 79–84; Iorgulescu, Prezent, 188–191; Negrici, Introducere, 77–81; Grigurcu, Existenţa, 421–425;  Călinescu, Biblioteci, 201–211;  Regman, De la imperfect, 172–185;  Dimisianu, Subiecte, 171–178;  Cristea, A scrie, 189–196; Negoiţescu, Scriitori contemporani, 152–158;  Pop, Pagini, 165–170;  Dicţ. analitic, I, 284–287, III, 81–83; Cărtărescu, Postmodernismul, 328–329;  Grigurcu, Amurgul, 165–166; Cistelecan, Top ten, 67–69; Dicţ. esenţial, 254–256;  Manolescu, Lista, I, 321–327;  Ştefănescu, Istoria, 839–850; Mircea Martin, Mai scrie poezii, Mircea Dinescu!, RL, 2008, 4; Manolescu, Istoria, 1089–1091; Popa, Ist. lit., II, 233–236; Al. Cistelecan, News alert: Mircea Dinescu a refuzat Premiul Nobel, CLT, 2011, 50.

👤Author Name: Mircea MorariuAffiliation: Universitatea din Oradea, Facultatea de LitereContact: mmorariu@uoradea.ro 📄Article Citation Recommendation: MORARIU, Mircea. „George Banu”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 205–210.Titlul: GEORGE BANUTitle: GEORGE BANUPages: 205-210Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/9_M_Morariu.pdf Bibliography: Mircea Morariu, [George Banu], F, 1994, 6, 1996, 3, 2001, 2, 2003, 5, 2004, 9, 2008, 6, TTR, 2008, 8–10, 2012, 1–2, 10–11, VTRA, 2012, 6–7;  Marina Constantinescu, [George Banu], RL, 1994, 23, 2001, 40, 2002, 38, 2008, 31, TTR, 1999, 12; Luc Bondy, La Fête de l’ instant: dialogues avec Georges Banu, Arles, 1996; ed. (Sărbătoarea clipei: dialoguri cu George Banu), Bucureşti, 2011; Peter Stein, Essayer encore, échouer toujours: entretiens avec Georges Banu, Bruxelles, 2000; Mircea Ghiţulescu, Efectul de lupă, CNT, 2001, 17;  Mihaela Michailov, Spectrele livezii, OC, 2002, 99; Mircea Morariu, Teatrul şi cărţile lui, Oradea, 2009, 215–224; Manolescu, Enciclopedia, 67–68; Ţintă fixă George Banu, VTRA, 2012, 6–7.

👤Author Name: Alex GoldișAffiliation: Universitatea „Babeş-Bolyai” din Cluj, Facultatea de LitereContact: al3xgoldis@yahoo.com 📄Article Citation Recommendation: GOLDIȘ, Alex. „Ion Druță”. In: RITL, New Series, IX, No. 1-4, January-December 2015, p. 199-204.Titlul: ION DRUȚĂTitle: ION DRUȚĂPages: 199-204Language: RomanianURL: https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/8_A_Goldis.pdf Bibliography: Gavrilov, Reflecţii, 19–34; Mihai Cimpoi, Creaţia lui Ion Druţă în şcoală, Chişinău, 1986;  Andrei Hropotinschi, Problema vieţii şi a creaţiei. Studiu critic despre opera lui I. Druţă, Chişinău, 1988;  Aspecte ale creaţiei lui Ion Druţă, coord. Mihail Dolgan, Haralambie Corbu, Chişinău, 1990;  Ciocanu, Critică, 254–267; Druţiana, Chişinău, 1990; Mircea Popa, Ion Druţă. „Glasul” redeşteptării, ST, 1991, 1; Val Condurache, Reintrarea în istorie, RL, 1991, 16; Florin Manolescu, Din literatura Basarabiei, LCF, 1992, 29;  Z. Ornea, „Povara bunătăţii noastre”, RL, 1992, 15;  Valeriu Cristea, [Ion Druţă], L, 1992, 20, 22–24, 26–27;  Valeriu Cristea, Teatrul lui Ion Druţă, CC, 1994, 1–3; Valeriu Cristea, Judecăţi şi prejudecăţi despre Ion Druţă, L, 1995, 5; Micu, Scurtă ist., III, 61–69;  Cimpoi, Ist. lit. Basarabia, 177–182;  Cosma, Romanul, II, 422–433;  L. Gorin, Ion Druţă. Biobibliografie, Donduşeni, 1999;Dicţ. esenţial, 268–270;